13 skills found
Conduct context-driven code reviews focusing on quality, testability, and maintainability. Use when reviewing code, providing feedback, or establishing review practices.
Code simplification skill for improving clarity, consistency, and maintainability while preserving exact behavior. Use when simplifying code, reducing complexity, cleaning up recent changes, applying refactoring patterns, or improving readability. Triggers on tasks involving code cleanup, simplification, refactoring, or readability improvements.
Runs a budget-aware Agent Health audit for Codex, Claude Code, agent instructions, verifier surfaces, and AI maintainability when agents ignore instructions, hooks/MCP fail, validation is missing, or AI-written code is hard to maintain. Flags issues by severity. Not for debugging code or reviewing PRs.
Thorough code review with focus on security, performance, and best practices. Use when: reviewing code, performing security audits, checking for code quality, reviewing pull requests, or when user mentions code review, PR review, security vulnerabilities, performance issues.
Simplifies code for clarity. Use when refactoring code for clarity without changing behavior. Use when code works but is harder to read, maintain, or extend than it should be. Use when reviewing code that has accumulated unnecessary complexity.
Review and refactor code in your project according to defined instructions
Surgical code refactoring to improve maintainability without changing behavior. Covers extracting functions, renaming variables, breaking down god functions, improving type safety, eliminating code smells, and applying design patterns. Less drastic than repo-rebuilder; use for gradual improvements.
Expert code reviewer focusing on quality, maintainability, performance, and best practices
This skill should be used when users request code review, refactoring, or code quality improvements for Ruby codebases. Apply Sandi Metz's four rules for writing maintainable object-oriented code - classes under 100 lines, methods under 5 lines, no more than 4 parameters, and controllers instantiate only one object. Use when users mention "Sandi Metz", "code quality", "refactoring", or when reviewing Ruby code for maintainability.
Systematically evaluate code changes for security, correctness, performance, and spec alignment. Use when reviewing PRs, assessing code quality, or verifying implementation against requirements.
Comprehensive code review with security, performance, and quality analysis. Use when users ask to review code, analyze code quality, evaluate pull requests, or mention code review, security analysis, or performance optimization.
In-depth code review for large PRs (>500 lines). Full analysis including architecture, performance, security, and maintainability.
