59 skills found
Diagnoses and fixes skills in the dotnet/skills repository that lose to their own baseline, fail to activate, time out, or return "no credible improvement". Use when an evaluation verdict is a regression or underpowered, when a skill regressed after a change, when /evaluate reports no results, or when deciding whether a weak skill should be strengthened or retired. Do not use for scaffolding a brand-new skill (use create-skill) or a brand-new eval (use create-skill-test).
Review a diff, branch, or PR against correctness, security, breaking-change, and quality standards — runs the validation gate, applies the built-in checklist plus any repo-local one, and produces severity-ranked findings with an approve/request-changes verdict. The review engine behind om-auto-review-pr and om-review-prs.
Establish review gates — criteria, checkpoints, and approval flow. Use when work ships without consistent review. For running one individual session, use `design-critique`.
数学建模竞赛最终验证和验收阶段，支持 Typst 和 LaTeX 双引擎。用于论文写完后检查章节数量、标题顺序、图表引用、数值一致性、占位符、内部文件泄露、参考文献、代码可复现性、编译和提交就绪状态。
Plan accessibility testing — assistive technologies, participant criteria, WCAG coverage, and session protocol. Use when scheduling testing with real AT users. Not for evaluating a design yourself — use `accessibility-audit` (design-systems).
Build a QA checklist for verifying that a build matches the design. Use at implementation review. For the spec engineers build from, use `handoff-spec`.
Generate a project-local verification skill that drives your app the way a user does — any language, framework, or platform. Use for /create-verification-skill, "make a control skill for this repo", or when a project has no scripted way to prove UI/CLI/service behavior.
Renders a component you choose in every state and scenario on a temporary page and stress tests it.
Confirm a change before merge. `/check verify` drives the real app to prove behavior against the spec (every acceptance criterion met, every surface built). `/check review` runs a senior code review on a fresh model, one that did not write the code. Verify after /develop, review before a PR. Writes to docs/reviews/, never edits code.
Write, fix, review, debug, and validate Flutter tests for apps, packages, and plugins. Use when adding unit tests, widget tests, integration tests, MethodChannel or plugin mocks, Mockito or mocktail test doubles, golden or accessibility checks, CI test commands, test failures, MissingPluginException, pump or pumpAndSettle problems, finder errors, build_runner mock generation, device integration testing, web integration testing, or flaky Flutter tests.
Conduct context-driven code reviews focusing on quality, testability, and maintainability. Use when reviewing code, providing feedback, or establishing review practices.
Verify a claim with fresh local evidence: restate it falsifiably, capture baseline and treatment, compare artifacts, and return VERIFIED, NOT VERIFIED, or INCONCLUSIVE.
