11 skills found
Required first preflight before every CCFA skill, including research, review, retrieval, experiments, visuals, and maintenance. Keep reasoning and communication direct, remove empty defensive framing, and preserve evidence and uncertainty. Also use for 去防御性 and 论文人性化. Apply prose edits only within the authorized task; specialist skills retain ownership.
Compile current scholarly evidence for a scientific manuscript or research brief. Use when the user explicitly asks to gather literature, references, background evidence, competing findings, or a manuscript research packet. Uses Parallel Search by default, Parallel Extract for source verification, Parallel Research for explicitly deep/exhaustive work, optional explicit Parallel Chat, and optional Perplexity only when requested or allowed as a failure fallback.
Make every number in the final PDF traceable to the exact code line that produced it. Uses \hypertarget/\hyperlink LaTeX commands and \num{formula} evaluated at compile time. Use for reproducibility and data integrity verification.
Draft, revise, and audit scientific manuscripts or reports with explicit evidence provenance, reporting-guideline coverage, authorship accountability, confidentiality controls, and local consistency checks. Use for manuscript sections, references, declarations, tables, figures, or submission preparation when scientific accuracy and traceability matter.
Polish, restructure, or translate academic prose into Nature-leaning English using writing-strategy principles, curated Nature/Nature Communications article patterns, and phrase-level support from Academic Phrasebank. Use whenever the user asks to polish a manuscript paragraph, abstract, introduction, results, discussion, conclusion, title, methods section, or Chinese academic draft for publication-quality English. Also covers LaTeX layout/typesetting (排版) fixes — loose or sparse pages, stranded
Guidance for structuring and writing PhD-level funding applications and grant proposals (e.g., NSF, NIH, ERC). Focuses on narrative arc, significance, innovation, and methodological feasibility.
Comprehensive scientific writing guidance for research papers, grants, and technical documentation.Covers paper structure (IMRAD), methods writing, results presentation, figure/table design, citationformatting, abstract writing, and revision responses. Use when users are writing scientific papers,formatting manuscripts, responding to reviewers, writing grant proposals, or need help with any aspectof scientific communication. Triggers include 'write a paper,' 'scientific writing,' 'format mymanus
Core skill for the deep research and writing tool. Write scientific manuscripts in full paragraphs (never bullet points). Use two-stage process: (1) create section outlines with key points using research-lookup, (2) convert to flowing prose. IMRAD structure, citations (APA/AMA/Vancouver), figures/tables, reporting guidelines (CONSORT/STROBE/PRISMA), for research papers and journal submissions.
Core skill for the deep research and writing tool. Write scientific manuscripts in full paragraphs (never bullet points). Use two-stage process with (1) section outlines with key points using research-lookup then (2) convert to flowing prose. IMRAD structure, citations (APA/AMA/Vancouver), figures/tables, reporting guidelines (CONSORT/STROBE/PRISMA), for research papers and journal submissions.
Look up current research information using Perplexity Sonar Pro Search or Sonar Reasoning Pro models through OpenRouter. Automatically selects the best model based on query complexity. Search academic papers, recent studies, technical documentation, and general research information with citations.
Structured manuscript/grant review with checklist-based evaluation. Use when writing formal peer reviews with specific criteria methodology assessment, statistical validity, reporting standards compliance (CONSORT/STROBE), and constructive feedback. Best for actual review writing, manuscript revision. For evaluating claims/evidence quality use scientific-critical-thinking; for quantitative scoring frameworks use scholar-evaluation.
