10 skills found
Evaluate scientific claims and evidence quality. Use for assessing experimental design validity, identifying biases and confounders, applying evidence grading frameworks (GRADE, Cochrane Risk of Bias), or teaching critical analysis. Best for understanding evidence quality, identifying flaws. For formal peer review writing use peer-review.
Calibrated grilling session for stress-testing a plan, design, idea, or decision. First assesses the user's topic knowledge, confidence, and desired pressure level, then asks one question at a time with recommended answers. Use when user says "grill me", "stress-test this", "challenge my plan", "interview me", or wants a plan probed without being overwhelmed.
Critically analyse the reasoning in written content (articles, blogs, transcripts, reports), not code. Use only when explicitly asked to critically analyse or critique an argument.
Use when challenging ideas, plans, decisions, or proposals using structured critical reasoning. Invoke to play devil's advocate, run a pre-mortem, red team, or audit evidence and assumptions.
理查德·费曼的思维框架与表达方式。基于40+个一手来源的深度调研， 提炼5个核心心智模型、8条决策启发式和完整的表达DNA。 用途：作为思维顾问，用费曼的视角分析问题、审视决策、提供反馈。 当用户提到「用费曼的视角」「费曼会怎么看」「费曼模式」「feynman perspective」「费曼学习法」时使用。 即使用户只是说「这是不是cargo cult」「命名不等于理解」「能不能做个演示替代论证」「我真的理解了还是只记住了名字」也可触发。 不要在用户只是说「帮我解释一下」「用简单的话说」等一般性请求时触发——只在涉及费曼式验证（货物崇拜检测、命名vs理解、反自欺）时激活。
Reading companion agent. Accompanies user through any text (books, articles, essays, papers, news) with translation, structural annotation, deep questioning, and cross-domain insights. Detects language, translates English to Chinese (faithfulness-expressiveness-elegance), guides reader to understand the author and encounter real questions. Use when user says '伴读', '陪我读', '读这篇', 'read with me', 'companion read', or shares a text/URL wanting guided reading.
追本之箭——纵向深钻思维工具。给一个观点、现象或问题，像箭一样一路向下钻到不可再分的本质。Use when user says '想透', '追本', '本质是什么', '为什么会这样', '深挖', '钻到底', 'think deep', 'drill down', or wants to trace any idea/phenomenon vertically to its irreducible root. Also trigger when user provides a statement and wants depth analysis, not breadth survey.
Applies rigorous critical analysis to evaluate claims, arguments, and research. Use when evaluating evidence quality, peer reviewing content, assessing argument validity, or identifying weaknesses in reasoning. Triggers on phrases like "critically analyze", "evaluate this", "review this paper", "check the logic", "assess the evidence", "find flaws", "peer review".
基础原则 - AI 助手的核心思维原则和指令框架概述。包含系统思维、辩证思维、创新思维和批判思维四大核心原则。
Flip core assumptions to reveal hidden constraints and alternative approaches - "what if the opposite were true?"
