Back to Skills

dbs-resonate

文稿共鸣诊断。你写完了一段内容但心里没底——怕没流量、怕没戳中观众、怕完播率低。把文稿给这个 skill,它用传播心理学框架诊断有没有引起共鸣、哪里出了问题、具体怎么改。 触发方式:/dbs-resonate、「这个文稿有没有戳中人」「帮我看看能不能发」「这个完播率会不会低」「文稿发出去有没有流量」 Draft resonance diagnosis. You finished a draft but aren't sure it will connect. Diagnoses psychological resonance issues and gives specific fixes. Trigger: /dbs-resonate, "will this resonate", "check my draft", "will people watch this"

7,430stars915forksUpdated 7/8/2026

Security Assessment

Safe(100/100)
Security Score100/100

About dbs-resonate

A draft-resonance diagnostic for content creators who have finished a piece of writing (a script or half-finished draft) but are unsure whether it will connect with an audience. Using a communication-psychology framework, it diagnoses whether the draft has the structure to resonate, pinpoints the specific problems, and gives concrete, actionable edits. It is aimed especially at the most common failure it names, writing that is comprehensive but fails to strike the core, and is triggered by the /dbs-resonate command or phrasings like "will this resonate" or "check my draft."

Its scope is deliberately bounded: it diagnoses psychological resonance and gives delete/keep/strengthen edits, but it does not predict platform-algorithm metrics like completion or click-through rate (handled by other skills such as /dbs-hook), does not check structural completeness, and does not analyze why already-proven content went viral. The method rests on three tenets: comprehensiveness is not professionalism (precision is), resonance is a structural problem rather than luck, and you must find the core mechanism before judging execution. The workflow extracts every claim in the draft, identifies the single true core (or flags core-unclear as the biggest problem), then runs a five-dimension diagnosis grounded in named theories, the spiral of silence, uses and gratifications, framing, two-step flow, and cognitive consistency, rating each as effective, weak, or ineffective with a reason tied to specific text.

Use it before publishing to catch a diluted or missing core and to get a rewrite direction. The output is a fixed-format report: a one-line core problem, a core-mechanism audit listing all claims and the real core, the five-dimension diagnosis, and specific edits (what to delete, what to compress into supporting detail, what to amplify, what to leave alone), ending with a one-line skeleton of the revised piece. It also documents common failure patterns, diluted core, mechanism stated but unexplained, stance drift, and weak silence-breaking, each with symptom, diagnosis, and fix, and routes to /dbs for next steps.

FAQ

What does dbs-resonate actually diagnose?

Whether a finished draft has the psychological structure to resonate with its audience, where the core problem is, and specific edits to fix it.

What does it explicitly not do?

It does not predict algorithm metrics like completion or click-through rate, does not check structural completeness, and does not analyze why already-validated content went viral.

What five dimensions does the diagnosis use?

Spiral of silence, uses and gratifications, framing, two-step flow (the communication entry point), and cognitive consistency (belief structure), each rated effective, weak, or ineffective.

What is the core-mechanism review step?

It lists every claim in the draft and identifies the single one that is the true core; if no clear core exists, it flags the core as unclear, which it treats as the biggest problem.

How specific are the suggested edits?

They must point to concrete text, naming what to delete, what to compress into supporting detail, what to amplify, and what to keep, and end with a one-line skeleton of the rewritten draft.

Install dbs-resonate

Download and extract the skill files to your .claude/skills/ directory.

Quick Setup:

  1. Copy the skill folder to .claude/skills/
  2. Claude will automatically detect and use the skill