Conducts systematic literature reviews with academic rigor. Use when you need to understand existing research on a topic, identify research gaps, trace the evolution of ideas, or build a comprehensive bibliography. Triggers on phrases like "literature review", "what does research say", "find papers on", "academic sources for", "systematic review of".
The literature-review skill is designed to assist users in synthesizing existing academic knowledge, identifying research gaps, and tracing the evolution of scientific ideas within a structured and systematic framework. By leveraging advanced search strategies and rigorous evaluation criteria, this skill addresses the challenge of navigating vast amounts of scholarly literature, ensuring that users can access reliable, evidence-based insights without relying on incomplete or unverified sources. It provides a structured approach to organizing findings, distinguishing between established consensus, emerging trends, and areas of ongoing scientific debate.
Key capabilities of this skill include optimized search strategy construction using Boolean logic, database navigation across platforms such as arXiv, PubMed, Semantic Scholar, and ACM, as well as citation chaining to identify relevant references and forward citations. It emphasizes quality and relevance screening by evaluating the authority of authors and institutions, balancing landmark studies with the latest publications, and applying strict inclusion and exclusion criteria. Thematic synthesis allows for chronological mapping of ideas, identification of under-researched areas, and clear documentation of conflicting findings, all supported by verifiable academic sources. Outputs follow a structured format including research questions, search parameters, thematic summaries, research gaps, and an annotated bibliography.
This skill is particularly valuable for researchers, graduate students, and academics who need to produce comprehensive literature reviews or bibliometric analyses. It supports systematic evidence synthesis for research proposals, dissertations, meta-analyses, and academic publications. By adhering to rigorous principles of factual integrity, source verification, and methodological transparency, it ensures that users can confidently build upon existing knowledge and identify opportunities for novel contributions in their field.
Begin by defining your research question and establishing inclusion/exclusion criteria. Then execute searches across academic databases using the optimized queries provided by the skill.
The skill supports primary academic databases such as arXiv, Semantic Scholar, PubMed, and ACM, and can perform citation chaining where supported.
Yes, but all citations are verified sources; it will not invent references and emphasizes factual integrity.
There is no strict limit, but the skill prioritizes quality and relevance over quantity, ensuring only verified and significant sources are included.
Yes, the skill explicitly maps gaps, under-researched areas, and contradictory results, providing context for further investigation.
Quick Setup:
.claude/skills/Repository
poemswe/co-researcher